Medical Economics Essays

Essays on Industrial Organization and Health Care Economics

Zachary Y. Brown

Title:
Essays on Industrial Organization and Health Care Economics
Author(s):
Brown, Zachary Y.
Thesis Advisor(s):
Ho, Katherine
Date:
2017
Type:
Theses
Degree:
Ph.D., Columbia University
Department(s):
Economics
Persistent URL:
https://doi.org/10.7916/D8FJ2V14
Abstract:
A central tenet of industrial organization is that market concentration leads to higher prices. At the same time, there is a growing awareness that the market for health care is unique due to its complexity, and it is often difficult for consumers to make fully informed decisions. Might information frictions exacerbate market power in concentrated markets and lead to higher prices? While a growing literature seeks to address this question in a number of contexts, this dissertation focuses on the lack of price transparency in health care. I argue that the inability of consumers to compare prices is a major factor leading to high prices when health care is provided by the private market. In Chapter 1, I use a dataset covering all private medical claims in a state to examine the introduction of a state-run website providing detailed information about out-of-pocket prices for a subset of medical procedures. Exploiting plausibly exogenous variation across procedures available on the website as well as the timing of the introduction, I use a difference-in-difference approach and find significant savings for both consumers and insurers. Part of the effect is due to consumers switching to lower cost providers. However, there is a small but significant supply-side effects in the long-run, i.e. there are lower negotiated prices. These lower prices benefit all insured individuals including those that do not use the website. Supply-side effects reduce price dispersion and are especially relevant when medical providers operate in concentrated markets. A relatively small fraction of consumers actually used the price transparency website when it was available. Therefore, it is important to understand why more consumers aren't using the price transparency tool and what would happen if more consumers were informed about prices. Answering this question requires a structural model, which is the focus of Chapter 2 and Chapter 3. In Chapter 2, I study demand for health care services when at least some consumers lack full information about prices. By exploiting the variation from the introduction of the website, I am able to separately identify consumer price sensitivity and the degree of uncertainty about prices. I also explicitly model the decision to use the price transparency website when it is available. This structural approach yields two main advantages over the reduced-form approach. First, the model can be used to examine what would happen if more consumers were incentivized to use the price transparency website. Second, the model provides insight into the welfare effects of price information. Finally, the reduced-form evidence that there is a supply-side effect of the website when even a small fraction of consumers are informed motivates a more in depth analysis of the supply-side. Chapter 3 combines the demand model of Chapter 2 with a model of bargaining between medical providers and insurers to examine how price transparency affects equilibrium prices. Model estimates and difference-in-differences estimates both imply that the website reduces health care spending by 3 to 4 percent. I then use the model to examine the effects of price transparency more generally. In counterfactual simulations, I find that price transparency would generate a substantial reduction in equilibrium prices if a larger fraction of consumers in the market were informed. Combining the price transparency website with high cost sharing would give individuals more incentive to use the price transparency tool, reducing health care spending by 18 percent. My research is intended to inform the policy debate surrounding the value of health care price transparency tools. In sum, I argue that while the value of price transparency tools is modest when only a small fraction of consumers are incentivized to use the tools, the savings become quite substantial when enough consumers are informed about prices.
Subject(s):
Economics
Industrial organization
Medical economics
Transparency in government
Item views
64
Metadata:
text | xml
Suggested Citation:
Zachary Y. Brown, 2017, Essays on Industrial Organization and Health Care Economics, Columbia University Academic Commons, https://doi.org/10.7916/D8FJ2V14.

“The patient experience that made me a better doctor”

Every physician has had one. That moment of joy, inspiration or—sometimes—anger from a patient interaction that sticks with them and can reshape who they are as a doctor.

Medical Economics wants to hear yours.

For our 2018 Physician Writing Contest, we are collecting stories from physicians about those moments with patients that made them better doctors. Whether a kind word, an act of courage or a rocky trip on the way to well-being involving a patient, we want to your story.

How to Enter

Send us your story in 800 to 1,200 words and fill out the form in entirety, below.

Deadline for Submissions

All entries must be received by April 6, 2018, at 11:59 p.m. for consideration.

Prizes:

1st Place: $2500, 2nd Place: $1500, 3rd Place: $1000

 

 


2018 Medical Economics Physician Writing Contest Official Rules

(NO PURCHASE IS NECESSARY TO ENTER OR WIN)

The 2018 Medical Economics Physician Writing Contest (the “Contest”) starts on February 5, 2018 at 12:00 a.m. Eastern Time (“ET”)and ends on March 5, 2018 at 11:59 p.m. ET (“Contest Period”).

ELIGIBILITY: The Contest is open to licensed physicians who are legal residents of the fifty (50) United States or the District of Columbia, of legal age of majority in their jurisdictions of residence (and at least 18). Employees, temporary workers, freelancers and independent contractors, and their immediate families (spouse and parents, children, siblings and their respective spouses, regardless of where they reside) and those persons living in their same households, whether or not related, of UBM, LLC (“Sponsor”) and their respective parents, affiliates, subsidiaries, participating vendors, promotion or advertising agencies are ineligible to enter or win the Contest. By participating, entrants agree to be bound by these Official Rules and the decisions of the judges and/or Sponsor, which are binding and final on matters relating to this Contest. Void where prohibited by law. Contest is subject to all applicable federal, state and local laws.

HOW TO ENTER: During the Contest Period, write an 800 to 1,200 word essay that shares your successful strategies, approaches, and/or experiences to achieve work-life balance as a physician and send to [email protected] or Medical Economics Writing Contest, c/o UBM, Millennium Place East, 25115 Country Club Blvd., North Olmsted, OH  44070, along with your full name, contact email address, mailing address and telephone number (collectively, an “Entry”). All Entries must be received on or before March 5, 2018. Limit one (1) Entry per person. Entries received in excess of the stated limitation will be void. If handwritten, Entries must be legible. All Entries become the sole property of the Sponsor and will not be returned. Entry must (i) be your own original work, (ii) be in English, (iii) cannot be previously published or submitted in connection with any other contest, (iv) be in keeping with the Sponsor’s and Supporter’s image and (v) not be offensive or inappropriate, as determined by the Sponsor in its sole discretion, nor can it defame or invade publicity rights or privacy of any person, living or deceased, or otherwise infringe upon any person’s personal or property rights or any other third party rights (including, without limitation, copyright). Without limiting the foregoing, Entries must not contain any confidential or personally-identifying patient information. Sponsor reserves the right to disqualify any Entry that it determines, in its sole discretion, does not comply with the above requirements or that is otherwise not in compliance with these Official Rules.

JUDGING: All eligible Entries received by the Sponsor will be judged by a panel of qualified judges based equally on the following criteria: practicality of solutions offered, clarity and quality of writing, and level of detail to enable other physicians to apply your solution to their practices. The three (3) Entries with the highest scores, as determined by the Sponsor in its sole discretion, will be deemed the first, second, and third place potential winners. In the event of a tie, an additional, “tie-breaking” judge will determine the winner(s) based on the criteria listed herein. Sponsor reserves the right not to award all prizes if, in its sole discretion, it does not receive a sufficient number of eligible and qualified Entries. Prize awards are subject to verification of eligibility and compliance with these Official Rules. Judges’ and Sponsor’s decisions are final and binding on all matters relating to this Contest.

WINNER NOTIFICATION: Potential winners will be notified by telephone, mail and/or email on or about April 15, 2018 and may be required to complete an Affidavit of Eligibility, Liability and Publicity Release (unless prohibited by law), which must be returned within a time period specified by Sponsor. Return of prize or prize notification as undeliverable, failure to sign and return requested documentation within the specified time period, the inability of Sponsor to contact a potential winner within a reasonable time period or noncompliance with these Official Rules by any potential winner will result in disqualification and, at Sponsor’s sole discretion, the prize may be awarded to a runner-up.

LICENSE/USE OF ENTRIES: By submitting an Entry, each entrant agrees that Sponsor and its designees shall have the worldwide perpetual right to exploit, edit, modify, and distribute such Entry, and all elements of such Entry, including entrant’s name and likeness, in any and all media now known or not currently known, and for any legal reason, without compensation, permission or notification to entrant.

PRIZES: One (1) First prize of $2500 VISA Gift Card (the “First Prize”), one (1) Second prize of a $1500 VISA Gift Card (“Second Prize”), and one (1) Third Prize of a $1000 VISA Gift Card (“Third Prize”). First Prize, Second Prize and Third Prize winners shall also receive publication of their respective Entry essays in a future edition of Medical Economics

Magazine, MedicalEconomics.com, the Modern Medicine Network, and/or affiliated publications with attribution to winners. Approximate Retail Value (“ARV”) of each prize is First Prize, $2,500; Second Prize, $1,500; Third Prize, $1,000. Gift cards are subject to terms and conditions specified thereon. All prize details, including publication decisions, are at Sponsor’s sole discretion. Sponsor may substitute a prize of comparable or greater value at Sponsor’s sole discretion. Prizes are non-transferable with no substitutions or cash redemptions except at Sponsor’s sole discretion. Additional restrictions may apply, subject to gift card terms and conditions available on the back of the gift card and in included literature. Winners are responsible for all applicable federal, state and local taxes, if any. Limit one (1) prize per person. In the event that Sponsor is unable to publish a winning essay, that part of prize will be forfeited and winner will receive a Visa Gift Card only. Sponsor makes no guarantee as to date of publication of each winning Essay.

GENERAL: By participating, each entrant agrees: (a) to abide by these rules and decisions of Sponsor and Judges, which shall be final in all respects relating to this Contest; (b) to release, discharge and hold harmless Sponsor, Supporter, their respective parents, affiliates, subsidiaries, and advertising and promotion agencies, and all of the officers, directors, shareholders, employees, agents and representatives of the forgoing (collectively, “Released Parties”) from any and all injuries, liability, losses and damages of any kind to persons, including death, or property resulting, in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, from entrant’s participation in the Contest or any Contest-related activity, or the acceptance, possession, use or misuse of the awarded prize or the use by Released Parties’ of any rights granted herein; and (c) to the use by Sponsor and its designees of his/her name, entry, biographical information, photograph, image and/or likeness for trade, advertising, publicity and promotional purposes in any and all media, now or hereafter known, worldwide and on the Internet, and in perpetuity, without compensation (unless prohibited by law), notification or permission, unless prohibited by law, and to execute specific consent to such use if asked to do so. Released Parties are not responsible for late, lost, damaged, delayed, inaccurate, misdirected, incomplete, illegible, undeliverable, destroyed, mutilated, stolen or postage-due entries, entry fees, or for errors or problems of any kind whether electronic, network, technical, typographical, printing, human or otherwise relating to or in connection with this Contest, including, without limitation, errors which may occur in connection with the administration of the Contest, the processing or judging of entries, or the announcement of the prizes or in any Contest-related materials. Persons who tamper with or abuse any aspect of the Contest, who act in an unsportsmanlike or disruptive manner or who are in violation of these Official Rules, as solely determined by Sponsor, will be disqualified and all associated Entries will be void. Should any portion of the Contest be, in Sponsor’s sole opinion, compromised by non-authorized human intervention or other causes which, in the sole opinion of the Sponsor, corrupt or impair the administration, security, fairness or proper play, or submission of Entries, Sponsor reserves the right at its sole discretion to suspend, modify or terminate the Contest and, if terminated, at its discretion, select the potential winners from all eligible, non-suspect Entries received prior to action taken using the judging procedure outlined above.

ANY ATTEMPT TO DELIBERATELY UNDERMINE THE LEGITIMATE OPERATION OF THE CONTEST MAY BE IN VIOLATION OF CRIMINAL AND CIVIL LAWS AND SHOULD SUCH AN ATTEMPT BE MADE, SPONSOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO SEEK DAMAGES AND OTHER REMEDIES (INCLUDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES) FROM ANY SUCH INDIVIDUAL TO THE FULLEST EXTENT OF THE LAW, INCLUDING CRIMINAL PROSECUTION. Sponsor reserves the right in its sole discretion to cancel or suspend any portion of the Contest for any reason.

REQUEST FOR WINNERS LIST: For the names of the Winners (available after May 1, 2018), send a self-addressed, stamped, envelope to: Attn: Chris Mazzolini, c/o UBM, Millennium Place East, 25115 Country Club Blvd., North Olmsted, OH  44070.

0 Replies to “Medical Economics Essays”

Lascia un Commento

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *